Flu shots.
Oct. 15th, 2004 02:00 pmNormally, I get my flu shot at work. They're eager to vaccinate us because our immunocompromised patients would otherwise be at high risk of catching the flu from an infected employee.
I asked a couple of the nurse practitioners whether we were getting flu shots this year. One of them told me that the patient clinics haven't received any flu vaccine yet. Apparently, there's been some discussion about rationing within the patient population - saving the vaccine for patients with lower CD4+ cell counts.
So I called my primary care provider. They don't have the vaccine, and they're not expecting to get any in. The nurse advised me to call the health department. So I checked the health department website, and discovered that they don't have any vaccine and aren't expecting to get any in. They recommend calling your primary care provider.
I knew my midwife's office wouldn't have the vaccine, but I called to ask if they knew where I could get it. Nope.
Employee Health at the hospital doesn't have it, and won't be getting the injectible vaccine. They might be getting a few doses of FluMist, the intranasal vaccine, which pregnant women can't take.
I knew there was a shortage, but I had no idea it was this bad.
If it were just me, or just me and the Li'l Critter, I'd be willing to take my chances. I mean, if I were to get the flu, the danger to the baby would be either from (1) fever, which can be safely controlled with Tylenol during pregnancy, or (2) dehydration, which can be treated with an IV. The flu wouldn't kill me, and it wouldn't kill the baby.
But if I got the flu, it might kill one of my patients. I'm not being hyperbolic. I have patients whose ability to mount an immune response is damn near zero.
Meanwhile, in
childfree, a healthy college student is bragging about managing to arrange a flu shot for herself. I quote: "I'm feeling good about it, because I keep telling myself I'm taking one away from some little brat who really doesn't need one."
I asked a couple of the nurse practitioners whether we were getting flu shots this year. One of them told me that the patient clinics haven't received any flu vaccine yet. Apparently, there's been some discussion about rationing within the patient population - saving the vaccine for patients with lower CD4+ cell counts.
So I called my primary care provider. They don't have the vaccine, and they're not expecting to get any in. The nurse advised me to call the health department. So I checked the health department website, and discovered that they don't have any vaccine and aren't expecting to get any in. They recommend calling your primary care provider.
I knew my midwife's office wouldn't have the vaccine, but I called to ask if they knew where I could get it. Nope.
Employee Health at the hospital doesn't have it, and won't be getting the injectible vaccine. They might be getting a few doses of FluMist, the intranasal vaccine, which pregnant women can't take.
I knew there was a shortage, but I had no idea it was this bad.
If it were just me, or just me and the Li'l Critter, I'd be willing to take my chances. I mean, if I were to get the flu, the danger to the baby would be either from (1) fever, which can be safely controlled with Tylenol during pregnancy, or (2) dehydration, which can be treated with an IV. The flu wouldn't kill me, and it wouldn't kill the baby.
But if I got the flu, it might kill one of my patients. I'm not being hyperbolic. I have patients whose ability to mount an immune response is damn near zero.
Meanwhile, in
no subject
Date: 2004-10-15 11:36 am (UTC)In theory I'm supposed to get one because of the asthma and I'm leaning towards skipping it cause there are people who need it more than I do.
I don't care if you're a childhater, (okay, I do but that's another story) but finding glee in someone else who needs that flu shot more than you do is just wrong. And Karma bites. Hard.
no subject
Date: 2004-10-15 11:40 am (UTC)This is why I specify that I am childless but not childfree.
You just watch...in 50 years, this person will be demanding their flu shot because they are at higher risk becaus they are older.
Living in a dorm does not confer a significantly higher risk.
Twit.
no subject
Date: 2004-10-15 11:45 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-15 11:47 am (UTC)Clearly you have yet to be introduced to such charming phrases as crotchfruit.
And only gets worse from there.
no subject
Date: 2004-10-15 11:48 am (UTC)I need to talk to my doctor about it - I normally get one because between the lung scarring and asthma (even if not normally that bad) and the interaction with kids (many of whom have younger siblings: lots of stuff gets passed around), it seems sensible.
On the other hand, if I'm *not* getting a flu shot (and with the shortages the way they are, I don't think I will be, unless my doctor has a very different view of my overall health than I think she does...) I want to know for certain what symptoms need particular attention, and if I'm a good candidate for some of 'make symptoms easier/make it milder' stuff.
But that's just being a mature adult, y'know? There are people out there who need it lots more than I do.
no subject
Date: 2004-10-15 11:58 am (UTC)I appreciate that you definitely do not want to be the vector by which the disease is transmitted, and I hope you can get a shot to prevent that. I'm just wondering how many other potential vectors your patients will also be interacting with.
no subject
Date: 2004-10-15 12:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-15 12:13 pm (UTC)'Childfree' means 'someone who's made a conscious decision not to have children'. That's all. It's a useful word, and letting a few idiots poison it for the rest of us is just dumb.
-J
no subject
Date: 2004-10-15 12:23 pm (UTC)So, I said...
As opposed to healthy adults, with immune systems fully developed, and who are aware enough to such precautions as basic hygiene and want it to avoid inconvenience?
Lets accept, arguendo, that you're not going to a clinic to take it away from someone who has a compromised immune system, your response... about little brats, and your explation, that your doctor has an eldery/sick client base don't really mesh... because that's one of your doctors patients who isn't getting it. One of those older people, or people with cancer; who might be weakened from chemo.
If you want to be selfish, go ahead, but don't lie to yourself about what you're doing.
I doubt I'm gonna get much love.
TK
no subject
Date: 2004-10-15 12:28 pm (UTC)I need to get the flu shot according to my doctor becuase 1: i live on campus 2: my immune system is not great being on immunosuprresants and having a autoimmunne disease but I wonder how much protection it actually provides. I got it last year because student health here does a pretty good job of actually holding back some of the vaccines for people with special circumstances and even make you get approval from one of the head doctors there before they will give it to you in order to make sure that at least the most at risk people get it. and so that people like this little college girl you mentioned wont be likely to get one at the sacrifice of someone who really needs it.
Anyways, I hope that the clinic your in will somehow be able to help you out being pregnant and at risk, etc.. cant be on meds and so on...
Iz
no subject
Date: 2004-10-15 12:39 pm (UTC)Sadly, I cannot say that the story you relate above is a one-off; many of the folks I've encountered who label themselves "childfree" behave in aggressively anti-child ways, almost at the level of homophobic behavior towards gays (excepting physical violennce).
no subject
Date: 2004-10-15 12:43 pm (UTC)Well, you know... it's a damn shame that words are so flipping limited.
Feminist, Christian, childfree... all labels that embody a huge number of ideas, that really say very little about a person's specific beliefs (even though they might say a great deal about a person's identity).
If we spoke in hypertext, with links to specific meanings for any ambiguous words, things would be a lot easier.
no subject
Date: 2004-10-15 12:45 pm (UTC)That may be because, unlike violence towards gays (at least until recently), the authorities are all over violence to children (at least by people not their parents) and you *will* go to jail.
no subject
Date: 2004-10-15 01:13 pm (UTC)I find that that's true of large parts of the organized childfree movement as I've seen it online, but it doesn't describe the actual childfree people that I know personally.
I have a lot of committedly childfree friends - most notably,
It's cold out there
Date: 2004-10-15 01:20 pm (UTC)Here's hoping that this is a very, very mild flu season, and I hope you can find the vaccine. I'm shocked but not surprised that your hospital can't get it at all.
no subject
Date: 2004-10-15 01:25 pm (UTC)Compare to proselytizers vs. the quietly religious and similar situations; same dynamic, just the details change.
no subject
Date: 2004-10-15 01:33 pm (UTC)Aw, Terry, you know you'll always get love from me.
The thing that struck me is how precisely she's projected her own attitude onto others. She justifies her choice with this whole routine about how awful it is that parents will try to get their children vaccinated even though the kids aren't really at elevated risk, and even though it means depriving the elderly and sick.
It's so nice of her to worry about the tiny speck in the eyes of these imagined parents, when she's got that great big beam in her own. Selfless, really.
no subject
Date: 2004-10-15 01:39 pm (UTC)Well, children over the age of two aren't considered high-risk (http://www.ci.baltimore.md.us/government/health/flu.html") unless they've got a chronic illness. So they're in the same category that she is.
If I were you, I'd let your doctor or the public health authorities decide whether you ought to be vaccinated or not. Your asthma is no joke, and with job hunting and so forth you're going to have a lot of public contact this flu season.
no subject
Date: 2004-10-15 02:00 pm (UTC)It means nothing coming from me - who does not identify as 'childfree.'
It would mean something from you.
no subject
Date: 2004-10-15 02:09 pm (UTC)That's venturing pretty far afield from my point, though, which was that it makes no sense to blame the word for a small percentage of people who use it who happen to be idiots. There's a kernel of truth to every stereotype, but overgeneralization doesn't help anybody. I have known many, many lovely people who refer to themselves as childfree, many more than the idiots who draw all of the attention. I cringe when I hear people tar all gay people with the brush of the heterophobes, all poly people with the brush of the flaky and commitment-phobic, and yes, all childfree people with the brush of the misanthropic.
-J
no subject
Date: 2004-10-15 02:12 pm (UTC)Well, *yeah*. This is livejournal, after all. I mean, would you want to assume that the majority of poly people are like the loudest folks who hang out in
-J
no subject
Date: 2004-10-15 02:15 pm (UTC)Changing stereotypes starts from within. If you are willing to call BS on those within your community who use that word in a hateful manner, than you are making a difference.
It is the passive acceptance of hateful use of that word which leads to the assumption that all people who are childfree fit that horrid stereotype.
no subject
Date: 2004-10-15 02:20 pm (UTC)Passive acceptance of idiotic behaviour is one thing that leads to that assumption. Failure to think rationally about the pervasiveness of that idiotic behaviour is another.
-J
no subject
Date: 2004-10-15 02:27 pm (UTC)Yeah, but somehow I suspect not from her. Which is fine.
I spotted that too. Maybe, just maybe, she'll take a lesson, but I'm not holding my breath.
Sort of like the idjit in ginmar, who pulled a "prove a negative," and told me it he didn't have the responsibility back his positive case, because that issue wasn't deciding his vote.
He's not gonna like it either.
Been a cranky day. :)
Tk
no subject
Date: 2004-10-15 02:53 pm (UTC)Some people need to learn that difference.