rivka: (for god's sake)
[personal profile] rivka
[livejournal.com profile] james_nicoll linked to the Voluntary Human Extinction Movement, an organization whose platform calls for a voluntary end to all human reproduction, as the only possible means of saving the environment.

So okay, they're crackpots. Pessimistic, misanthropic, doom-relishing crackpots. There's something to shake your head at on every page. But what really got me was this little fantasy about how great it would be if the ability to reproduce suddenly vanished, worldwide:

Gradual extinction of the human race will result if zygotes of Homo sapiens never again begin cell division.

Abortion providers might be the first to notice -- happily going out of business in a few months. A worldwide panic might set in, but without reason. There would be no negative impact on the world nor on society as a whole.

Individuals' lives could change profoundly, but all for the good. Starving people would begin finding enough to eat and resources would become more plentiful. New housing would be unnecessary.

All human technology would be scaled back but could still advance. Nuclear power plants could begin to be safely decommissioned. Dams could be removed. Technology could focus on dealing with unsolved problems such as radioactive and other toxic wastes. Healing the wounds of past exploitations could become a priority, reversing the expanding deserts and shrinking forests.

Some of our influences, such as global warming, may be impossible to stop and reverse at this point, but we could ameliorate the effects somewhat.

Conditions for society would also improve as shortages are eliminated and our death rate drops to an unheard of low.

Domestic plants and animals could be phased out as farms and ranches are converted to ecosystems supporting wildlife and natural vegetation.

The last humans could enjoy their final sunsets peacefully, knowing they have returned the planet to as close to the garden of Eden as possible under the circumstances.

The last one out could turn off the lights.


The only conclusion I can come to, based on this section, is that the folks at VHEMT are a bunch of young, healthy idiots who sit at their computers all day and have never actually ventured out into society or even met another human being.

Although I suppose that there is the alternative hypothesis: that once humans stop reproducing, a race of invisible fairies will appear to provide the labor and services required to allow an aging population to "enjoy their final sunsets peacefully."

Date: 2007-08-21 03:37 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] telerib.livejournal.com
There would be no negative impact on the world nor on society as a whole... Healing the wounds of past exploitations could become a priority

...right. Because we'd suddenly care much more about a planet we weren't living on than one we were?

have never actually ventured out into society or even met another human being.

QFT!

Date: 2007-08-21 03:38 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ratphooey.livejournal.com
There is so much that's wrong with the above that I don't know where to begin.

Oy.

Date: 2007-08-21 03:45 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] james-nicoll.livejournal.com
The only conclusion I can come to, based on this section, is that the folks at VHEMT are a bunch of young, healthy idiots who sit at their computers all day and have never actually ventured out into society or even met another human being.

Hey, I just found about VHEMT and thought it was a really great idea. I'm 19 years old [...]

Date: 2007-08-21 03:56 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ricevermicelli.livejournal.com
Never mind the unspeakable horror of being the last one out.

I can't imagine it, but the very thought makes me want to cry.

Date: 2007-08-21 03:57 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] epi-lj.livejournal.com
Honestly, I think that a lower population would solve a lot of problems. However, it bugs me that that opinion is so stained by nutcases. :( I don't think it's necessary to extinguish humanity entirely to achieve a lower population, and I don't think that putting laws on how many kids people can have or forcibly sterlizing people is the answer either. Generally, I think that the best way to halt the population explosion is to teach better sex education, to make the means of safe sex available to anybody who wants them, and to generally increase the education level and standard of living of everyone.

It's certainly true that if we had, say, a billion people right now many of the environmental issues would be a lot better than they are having eight billion people, and the possibility for future sustainability would be much greater. It also really alarms me that between prehistory and 1950 we went from nobody-ish to two and a half billion people and then from 1950 to now we went from two and a half billion to seven and a half billion.

My biggest worry about it is that if we don't find *good* ways to encourage curbed population growth and/or population reduction, then circumstances, reality, human nature, pollution, availability of resources, etc., will find *bad* ways to curb us.

Date: 2007-08-21 04:07 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kcobweb.livejournal.com
It's the childfree movement taken to the logical extreme. I just want to know, what is their strategy for convincing all 6,613,181,920 people on the planet that it's in their best interest to not reproduce at all/further?

Date: 2007-08-21 05:15 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tchemgrrl.livejournal.com
They must imagine that the animals would be so happy about our self-extinction that they'd tend to the elderly, turn themselves into food, etc. Sort of like Cinderella, with the birds. Right?

Date: 2007-08-21 06:18 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] wcg.livejournal.com
a race of invisible fairies will appear

Sure! It could happen.

Date: 2007-08-21 09:19 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] windypoint.livejournal.com
Those who most oppose humans reproducing are almost always in professions and lifestyles that rely pretty much on high population for their existence. When they quit their jobs in cities, large shops, centres of learning, factories, computer based inductries etc etc and hie to the farmlands to take up organic subsitence farming and weaving of baskets for a living, to live in little timber slab huts devoid of materials and objects constructed in factories, then I'll start taking their nonsense seriously.

Date: 2007-08-21 10:04 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bosssio.livejournal.com
Crowded conditions and resource shortages will improve as we become less dense. (from their website).

I am sure crowded conditions and resource shortages will improve as the members of VHEMT become less dense, though I am surprised at their honest critique of their own philosophy.

Date: 2007-08-22 11:41 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] moeticae.livejournal.com
:Shrug: Self-correcting problem.

Date: 2007-08-22 02:44 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sashajwolf.livejournal.com
a race of invisible fairies will appear to provide the labor and services required to allow an aging population to "enjoy their final sunsets peacefully."

I like your way of putting it better than mine, but I've made the same basic point to a few people who supported voluntary human extinction, and I have yet to receive an answer.

Profile

rivka: (Default)
rivka

April 2017

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 4th, 2025 07:44 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios