rivka: (sex ed)
rivka ([personal profile] rivka) wrote2007-10-08 11:15 am
Entry tags:

OWL planning, or, Rivka views porn at church.

I met with our Director of Religious Education and my OWL co-teacher on Sunday to plan out the course. We're getting a late start, unfortunately, because we won't go away for training until the weekend of October 19-21. Then we need to hold a parent orientation, to explain exactly what we'll be putting their children through. That leaves us with the choice of starting the course right before the holidays and then having a big gap, or waiting until January. We chose January.

In order to get a 27-session class to fit into the spring semester, we're planning to do two overnights at the church. Intellectually, I think it's a great idea. Most kids love overnights, and middle schoolers don't get to go along to the weekend-long cons that are the mainstay of the teen program, YRUU. So overnights will help make OWL attractive and special for the kids. They'll also give a big boost to group bonding and cohesion. (We're planning an overnight as our second class activity.) We'll do three 90-minute class sessions (one on Friday night and two on Saturday) and leave the rest of the time for games and fun stuff. So that's all good.

On the other hand: we'll be spending nearly 24 hours locked in the church with a bunch of 12-14 year olds, who will almost certainly want to stay up all night and get into as much trouble as possible. Why don't they just kill me now and spare me the hassle of organizing the course sessions?

The other thing we did at our meeting was look at the infamous OWL Slide Set. The slides are kept under lock and key, cannot be duplicated, and may never leave the church. They're sold only to churches with certified OWL leaders, never to secular organizations. Parents are required to view them before the class begins and sign a statement attesting to that fact. And, um, wow. For good reason.

There are three sets of slides: anatomy, masturbation, and lovemaking. I saw the anatomy set first, and thought, "Wow, these are great." There are the labeled line drawings that most of us probably had in health class, and then there are also detailed, realistic, drawings of naked people and external genitalia, including comparative drawings showing the wide range of normal variations in appearance.

Then came the lovemaking slides, which are detailed, realistic drawings of people having sex. Really detailed and really realistic. There are separate sequences for a male-female couple, a male-male couple, and a female-female couple, plus a set of "outercourse" pictures showing each of the three couples engaged exclusively in non-penetrative activities. And whoa. They're nicely done, in a way that conveys emotional as well as physical intimacy. But holy cow are they explicit. And the series goes on and on and on.

After that, the masturbation slides were (if you'll pardon the expression) anti-climactic. There's a short series of detailed, realistic, explicit drawings showing various ways that men and women masturbate.

I know that probably all of the kids in the class have seen porn in one form or another, most likely on the internet. These pictures are much better than the things they've probably been exposed to in the past - more respectful, more mutual, more loving. I do see the value in showing these materials. But I'm having a hard time imagining myself working the slide projector and reading the explanatory script. Not to mention showing the slides to the parents, just a month from now.

Surely the training will prepare us for that. Right?

[identity profile] ailsaek.livejournal.com 2007-10-08 03:47 pm (UTC)(link)
Eep! They sound wonderful and educational and everything, but I think I'd die.

[identity profile] bosssio.livejournal.com 2007-10-08 03:58 pm (UTC)(link)
wow.

I think it will be harder to show it to the parents than the kids, frankly.

I am sure the course will give you more guidance, but I hope they want you to honest about how these images, shown in public with a group of people you barely know, makes you feel uncomfortable. Uncomfortable doesn't equal bad, of course, nor something that shouldn't be done. It is just we are raised to think of some things to be PRIVATE and making the private public is a big taboo in polite society. And I personally think this is a BIG thing to convey to adults and kids alike - that it is okay to talk about things that make you uncomfortable.

I'd love to hear what guidance the course trainers give you.

[identity profile] hobbitbabe.livejournal.com 2007-10-08 04:13 pm (UTC)(link)
One of the reasons for being so careful to make sure all the parents know what to expect and to get that documented, is that to make all this work with the kids you'll be building a community of intimacy and trust with them - and yes, I think having a sleepover/camp early on will help a lot with that. Everybody - kids, parents, teachers - needs to see that there is nothing that happens in the course that kids would need to keep secret from parents, because a climate of secrecy has the potential to be dangerous for everybody.

Do you have any sense about how many kids are likely to do the course? Will there be kids from outside your congregation, whose parents hear about it and want their kids to be part of it?

(Anonymous) 2007-10-08 04:15 pm (UTC)(link)
As a kid who went through AYS before the OWL curriculum became current, suck it up and act unembarrassed, please. The kids will, at best be pretending cool disinterest, at worst be attempting crude humor, but it's all a cover for how intensely they've been wanting a detailed guide. Just teach a normal class while pretending you're an alien who doesn't see why this isn't totally normal.

[identity profile] hobbitbabe.livejournal.com 2007-10-08 04:29 pm (UTC)(link)
Oh, and thinking about my own camp experience with older teenagers: two adults can keep lots of kids involved and supervised in a 90-minute class, but for long periods of supervision in a freer setting, more leaders are very helpful. Especially if it means the person organizing the supper or the trust-building games can be a different person from the one getting ready to lead the discussion. So whatever preparations would be needed to get several adults / young adults involved in the fun activities and management of the overnight - whether or not they'd need to attend the OWL teacher training, you'd need to get them vetted and be involved in planning the activities. And it would be a bonus if they were not last year's RE teachers and mostly not these kids' parents.

When we take our 17yo on an overnight trip early in their time with us, it's terrific for the community. But I couldn't do it without enough staff / contractors to separate the "program" and "supervision" roles, and to make sure everyone gets some time off shortly afterwards. Can you book the Mondays off work ahead of time?

[identity profile] kcobweb.livejournal.com 2007-10-08 04:39 pm (UTC)(link)
In my experience, dealing with the parents is the hard part - because they bring so much baggage with them. See that viewing as a trial run, and then the kids will be *easy*. The kids *want* this information desperately, even if they don't know how to ask. And once you establish a foundation of trust and respect, they will be cool. (Middle school is tricky - but my formula for working with older teens boils down to "treat them with respect" because teens are so starved for respect.)

just because you know that someone had to say it...

[identity profile] anach.livejournal.com 2007-10-08 08:02 pm (UTC)(link)
you've taken Ordinary Wizarding Levels to a completely different place...
ext_2918: (Default)

[identity profile] therealjae.livejournal.com 2007-10-09 01:55 am (UTC)(link)
Wow. I'm totally impressed!

-J
ext_6381: (Default)

[identity profile] aquaeri.livejournal.com 2007-10-09 11:54 am (UTC)(link)
I don't know if this helps give you some perspective. I grew up in Denmark in the 1970s, including getting to the explicit sex education (at school) at 11, shortly before we moved to Australia (where I only heard some much coyer information later, and it would have annoyed me incredibly if that was all).

I really appreciated getting the information, and I've noticed as an adult I am a lot more laid-back about explicit sexual detail (in the educational sense) than most of the people around me. It makes it easier to talk to one's doctor too.

This might be incredibly awkward for you and the parents, but hopefully you are changing all that for the next generation.

[identity profile] perceval.livejournal.com 2007-10-09 06:54 pm (UTC)(link)
What are OWLs? (Dumb question from a non-Unitarian)

[identity profile] redbird23.livejournal.com 2007-10-11 01:33 am (UTC)(link)
One of my church friends and I were talking at the retreat last weekend about how to talk to our (currently a year old) boys about their bodies and sexuality as they get older.

We were discussing OWL, and I knew that there was more to it than the full year program because of entries you have made before. We came to the conclusion that it would be wonderful if there was a session(s) for parents of young children to help them figure out the right things to say and teach in the years before OWL kicks in.

Our church only uses the full year program - I am wondering if joining the RE committee and being persistant might be enough to change that...