Entry tags:
Well, crap.
Last night Dorian was here to go over some things in preparation for being our labor&delivery childcare. I let her feel a hard bump of baby sticking out on my right side. "That must be his bottom," I said trustingly. "Because it's round, and we know he's head down."
Yeah.
This morning I had my 38-week midwife appointment. All went well until she put me up on the table to assess Niblet's position, heartbeat, and size. At which point it became clear that he is not head down anymore, and that the hard round thing sticking out on my right side is in fact his head.
The good news is that he's still floating; no part of him is engaged in the pelvis, so he's not wedged in this way. He was transverse (crossways) when the midwife examined me, with his head kind of down by my right hip. She sent me over to the hospital for a confirmatory ultrasound, and the sonographer noted that he had turned breech: his head was still over on the side, higher up, and his feet were on my cervix. Then I was examined again by an OB, at which point he was fully transverse again. So he definitely has room to move.
We've scheduled an external cephalic version for Tuesday, February 3, when I'll be just about 39 weeks pregnant. I'll be seeing the OB I saw today, whom I liked very much. His name is Dr. Atlas, he's the chair of the Obstetrics department, he works with my midwives a lot, and he's very supportive of natural birth. I thought he struck a good balance between being warm and kind, and not holding back any information.
In an external version, the doctor literally flips the baby over into a more favorable position by pressing on the outside of the belly. ("Emphasis should be on gentle persuasion of the fetus as opposed to forceful movements," says the article, fortunately.) The article I linked to is kind of old, but offers a good description of what happens. They cite a 65% success rate. Here's the potential outcome tree Dr. Atlas outlined for me:
1. The baby is successfully flipped and then stays head-down, and I go into labor naturally.
2. The baby is successfully flipped and then flips back to breech or transverse, at which point we either schedule a C-section or wait until labor begins and do a C-section.
3. The baby can't be flipped. We schedule a C-section or wait until labor begins and do a C-section.
4. The baby becomes distressed by the procedure and there is an immediate emergency C-section.
Obviously that last one is a low-frequency outcome, but nevertheless the procedure is done on the L&D floor with an OR and an anesthesiologist nearby.
I've read that the success of ECV is heavily dependent on the skill and experience of the doctor, and it seems like I'll be in good hands there.
So, uh, we'll see what happens. Apparently it's not out of the realms of possibility that he'll turn back rightways round himself. Here's hoping.
Yeah.
This morning I had my 38-week midwife appointment. All went well until she put me up on the table to assess Niblet's position, heartbeat, and size. At which point it became clear that he is not head down anymore, and that the hard round thing sticking out on my right side is in fact his head.
The good news is that he's still floating; no part of him is engaged in the pelvis, so he's not wedged in this way. He was transverse (crossways) when the midwife examined me, with his head kind of down by my right hip. She sent me over to the hospital for a confirmatory ultrasound, and the sonographer noted that he had turned breech: his head was still over on the side, higher up, and his feet were on my cervix. Then I was examined again by an OB, at which point he was fully transverse again. So he definitely has room to move.
We've scheduled an external cephalic version for Tuesday, February 3, when I'll be just about 39 weeks pregnant. I'll be seeing the OB I saw today, whom I liked very much. His name is Dr. Atlas, he's the chair of the Obstetrics department, he works with my midwives a lot, and he's very supportive of natural birth. I thought he struck a good balance between being warm and kind, and not holding back any information.
In an external version, the doctor literally flips the baby over into a more favorable position by pressing on the outside of the belly. ("Emphasis should be on gentle persuasion of the fetus as opposed to forceful movements," says the article, fortunately.) The article I linked to is kind of old, but offers a good description of what happens. They cite a 65% success rate. Here's the potential outcome tree Dr. Atlas outlined for me:
1. The baby is successfully flipped and then stays head-down, and I go into labor naturally.
2. The baby is successfully flipped and then flips back to breech or transverse, at which point we either schedule a C-section or wait until labor begins and do a C-section.
3. The baby can't be flipped. We schedule a C-section or wait until labor begins and do a C-section.
4. The baby becomes distressed by the procedure and there is an immediate emergency C-section.
Obviously that last one is a low-frequency outcome, but nevertheless the procedure is done on the L&D floor with an OR and an anesthesiologist nearby.
I've read that the success of ECV is heavily dependent on the skill and experience of the doctor, and it seems like I'll be in good hands there.
So, uh, we'll see what happens. Apparently it's not out of the realms of possibility that he'll turn back rightways round himself. Here's hoping.
no subject
Maybe try one or two? I don't think they can hurt (like the inversions) and you might be able to get the baby to turn sans ECV.
This is one of my big worries - so! You have my utmost empathy! I bet he will flip. Good niblit!
N.
(no subject)
no subject
(Oddly, you're the second pregnant person I know having a version done this month. I guess January is a good month for free-floatin' in the uterus...)
no subject
(no subject)
no subject
I hope this isn't an upsetting questions (I really don't know), but don't they do any natural breech births? I guess I was under the impression that intervening with c-section for breech wasn't strictly necessary, though what hospitals preferred (kind of like constant monitoring).
When I was pregnant with Eddie, I shared this article on "natural" c-sections with my wonderful OB. While we didn't have lavendar and soft music and all, she did pull him out a bit more slowly, to help clear the fluids a bit better. She shared later with me that she started doing all non-emergency c-sections that way, and was pleased with the results. Henry was my baby in the NICU with fluid troubles, not Edward.
But really, here's to flipping!
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
I totally get you not wanting to try a vaginal breech, despite me having an extremely good experience with it. I would say to weigh the options carefully in terms of when to go for a c-section if that is how it ends up - a friend of mine was all prepped for a c-section due to breech presentation when they did a last minute ultrasound, and found baby was head down, fully engaged (i.e. wasn't going to move again). She was really pressured by her OB and the nurses to "go ahead and get the baby out" even though there was no longer a good reason.
And some now feel that the trial of labor is helpful for the baby, even with the result being a c-section. at least you will know that the baby isn't artificially premature if labor has started. Most OBs want to schedule it, though, and will press you hard to not go into labor before the section.
I hope you don't have to face these decisions at all - sending niblet turning vibes!!!
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
work, but we discovered during my c-section that i had a heart shaped
uterus, and Liam was pretty wedged in there without room to move.
Doesn't sound like that's the case for Niblet, so i'll be crossing my
fingers for you.
There are a bunch of low intervention techniques for turning breech
babies - lying on a slanted board with your head lower than your feet
is one (encourages gravity to work on the baby's heavy head), and
there are a bunch of others. Might be worth trying between now and
your ECV to see if you can encourage him to turn on his own, and avoid
the procedure altogether. Let me know if you'd like to me to dig up
links from when I was going through it.
no subject
no subject
no subject
P.
no subject
no subject
On Friday, she was *engaged* and *head down* and *pushing on the cervix* and everything and it was good -- and since then, not only has she moved back up, she keeps sliding diagonally-transverse now and again.
It's nerve-wracking ... she's spent THREE SOLID MONTHS with her hiccups coming from below my pubic hair, and now in the middle of week 37 she's suddenly doing flips??
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
As you know from your breastfeeding experience, sometimes things don't go according to plan and it is just fine to make the decision that you feel best nutures and cares for your child. Not that you needed me to say that, but you know... it's hard.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
Also, the breast feeding thing? Look at Z and Alex. Couldn't really have done any harm, could it, because isn't it hard to think how it might have improved them?
no subject
I hope that Niblet puts his head back down and stays there!
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2009-01-28 10:12 pm (UTC)(link)(no subject)
no subject
no subject
The mother of my nephew had an ECV. Said it was more painful than giving birth, but it worked.
no subject