rivka: (Default)
[personal profile] rivka
Yesterday I bought some black-tipped shark filets for dinner. I'd never cooked shark before, so I poked around some food sites to see how other people cook it. I wound up marinating the filets for a couple of hours (in lime juice, beer, oil, garlic, cumin, parsley, salt, pepper, and dijon mustard) and then broiling them. We had couscous and sauteed zucchini on the side. It was good.

As I was cooking, I thought about my mother. She would never have bought shark filets - "I wouldn't have any idea what to do with them." Throughout my childhood, she made very simple meals of the type she'd learned about in home ec class in high school: baked chicken, mashed potatoes and gravy, and spinach. Pork chops, rice, and peas. Apple pie. Chocolate cake. She's branched out some in recent years, mostly using recipes my sister and I have given her, but the foundation of her cooking is plain food.

I've always thought of my mother as a good cook. Her baked chicken is good baked chicken, well-cooked but not dry, with crisp golden skin. Her mashed potatoes don't come from a mix, and they don't have lumps. Her piecrusts don't come from a package. Sometimes she made food I didn't like, when I was growing up, but she never made meals that didn't "turn out."

As I've gotten more involved with cooking, though, I start wondering what the definition of "a good cook" really is. I think of myself as a decent cook - I make a lot of different dishes, and most of them taste good. But not everything I make is a success. I use a lot of recipes - I tend to think of good cooks as being more inventive than that, or as cooking from general principles rather than from specific instructions. I sometimes fall back, lazily, on prepared foods - Zatarian's red beans and rice, for example, from a boxed mix. I think of good cooks as making their beans and rice from scratch. I don't use a lot of fancy techniques.

Am I a better cook than my mother, because I do more with sauces and marinades and seasonings? Is grilled fish with tropical fruit salsa inherently better food than baked chicken? Is creativity a requirement, or is the only requirement that food taste good?

I'm curious to know what other people think.


[Poll #97174]

Good? Gourmet? Adventurous?

Date: 2003-01-30 08:57 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] trinker.livejournal.com
Like Bill, I think there are different categories of "good". One of my recent additions to my self-definition has been "the ability to cope with unusual situations". I've been cooking in a lot of unfamiliar kitchens, without my entire batterie de cuisine. Some of the results have been better than others. It's gotten me to appreciate the gadgets I've grown to depend on, and also made me appreciate my beloved knife even more.

My current definition is something like, "should be able to deal with disasters, and should know enough dishes (whether by use of recipes or improvisation or memory) to satisfy the need-for-variety of the cook's primary audience."

I remember us having more than a few discussions about food. And your mentioning things about cake and frosting from-scratch, as opposed to boxed mix. I talked about that later with my mother, who claims now that I'm a better cook than she is. I like the compliment from her, but I wonder, am I really? Or am I just more adventurous and pretentious? I think it counts that she's able to whip out a tasty meal quickly. I'm still working on that.

Profile

rivka: (Default)
rivka

April 2017

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 18th, 2026 02:49 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios