rivka: (mourners)
rivka ([personal profile] rivka) wrote2003-02-01 11:53 am
Entry tags:

(no subject)

It hurts me to see people whose first reaction to this is to look around for someone to hate.

I'm not talking about people who are afraid that it might have been terrorism. For the most part, I think those folks just don't know enough about the plausibility of shooting down a fast-moving spacecraft at 200,000 feet. I'm talking about the people who are already spinning fantasies about the evil their enemies will make of this: Bush will use this as an excuse for war! The media is certain to play up terrorism speculation to increase ratings! And - I'm not kidding, I really saw this as someone's initial reaction on LJ - only the evil racists in Congress, who can't bear the idea of non-whites in space, will prevent the space program from being utterly shut down!

Yes, we know that you think Republicans are the worst people in the world. Yes, it's terrible to think that some Republicans' first reaction to this tragedy would not be to mourn the victims or praise their courage, but to look for a way to blame people they despise. Look at the motes in those Republican eyes! Maybe you should offer to help them take it out.
geminigirl: (Default)

[personal profile] geminigirl 2003-02-01 08:58 am (UTC)(link)
CNN has actually been running on the crawl something about it not likely being terrorist related. I'm glad for that. I'm not sure if it will have the desired reaction, but at least it's something.
ext_6418: (Default)

[identity profile] elusis.livejournal.com 2003-02-01 08:59 am (UTC)(link)
Remember that a normal stage of grief is anger, often externalized.

I'm grudgingly giving the White House credit for so quickly saying "it's not terrorism" rather than just letting the media carry the message and opening up doubts with official silence.

[identity profile] rivka.livejournal.com 2003-02-01 11:38 am (UTC)(link)
Remember that a normal stage of grief is anger, often externalized.

True. But "normal" doesn't mean that inappropriately directed expressions of anger shouldn't be discouraged. I wouldn't want to see right-wing people make political hay of this tragedy before the debris has even cooled, so I think it's incumbent on me to challenge left-wing people who are doing the same thing.

[identity profile] mactavish.livejournal.com 2003-02-01 09:06 am (UTC)(link)
That didn't even occur to me, honestly. I was glad to hear it's probably not related to terrorism, then I started thinking about the families. :/

[identity profile] mactavish.livejournal.com 2003-02-01 09:07 am (UTC)(link)
(Oh, and the space program -- I did think, "I hope this doesn't end the shuttle program, and the ISS, forever. . . .")

[identity profile] thbeatnik.livejournal.com 2003-02-01 09:12 am (UTC)(link)
I agree with you.
I had a similar feeling of irritation this morning at my doctor's office. The nurses hadn't had the news on; when I told them about Columbia, one of them announced "Well, Man wasn't meant to be flying around in space anyway."
I know that irrational reaction to tragedy isn't unusual. But some of those reactions seem to reveal core beliefs that are unsettling to me.

[identity profile] aerden.livejournal.com 2003-02-01 10:01 am (UTC)(link)
::Nods:: It is irritating. Already, I'm hearing the news reporters--and I'm sure it's just to fill air time, not because they really think this--but already, they're making these rhetorical comments--even to the poor Israeli mabassador to the UN, about whether it might have been terrorism. ("You hate to say it, but you can't help but wonder...") I am sure he does not need that, right now.

It really does anger me. But I know my own news media too well. I saw how they acted over the Chandra Levy disappearance, how they're acting over the Lacy Peterson disappearance, and so on. We are going to get wall-to-wall coverage of this in the States, whether we want it or not.

It is so depressing.

Thankfully, talk seems to be turning away from terrorism and more toward speculation over the adequacy NASA's recent funding.

It's a safer topic, but it's still speculation, rather than facts. We won't know any facts until the investigation is completed.

So I'm going to wait for facts. And see if there's any possible way that we can lower our house flag to half-staff.

::sigh; feeling very, very sad::

[identity profile] klwalton.livejournal.com 2003-02-01 10:13 am (UTC)(link)
It really does anger me. But I know my own news media too well. I saw how they acted over the Chandra Levy disappearance, how they're acting over the Lacy Peterson disappearance, and so on. We are going to get wall-to-wall coverage of this in the States, whether we want it or not.

As one of the network news technicians who just had to spend 2 more weeks in Modesto, CA, I'll tell you the reason why you all got Laci Peterson and Chandra Levy and the Yosemite murders and the WTC and Oklahoma City wall to wall to wall is because when those stories were on the air, ratings *spiked*. They didn't bump, they didn't do a gentle roll, they *spiked*. So it isn't a matter of "whether we want it or not". You (the collective "you") *do* want it. So you get it. If ratings slumped, it would go off the air in a snap.

The explosion of Columbia is a legitimate news story, and the media *should* be covering this as deeply as possible. NASA is a government agency funded by tax dollars - the legitimate drive for scientific exploration is, and always will be, counterbalanced by both internal and external political concerns.

It's unfortunate that the 24-hour news services have a lot of air time to fill, and that they *will* speculate to fill that air time. But at this point I've seen all three major networks and CNN say that terrorism is a very unlikely cause of today's disaster.

[identity profile] aerden.livejournal.com 2003-02-01 10:27 am (UTC)(link)
Yes, I agree. The Columbia explosion is a legitimate news story. And they have been downplaying the speculation, thank goodness.

I'm listening to the KSC administrator right now, and I'm quite impressed with the Mishap Investigation procedures they're putting into place. They're handling this very promptly and efficiently, it looks like.

Re:

[identity profile] aerden.livejournal.com 2003-02-01 12:53 pm (UTC)(link)
Oh, lord! I feel sorry for the news folks who have to spend so long on those high-profile stories. If I recall correctly, some news folks were kinda-sorta almost relieved when 9/11 gave them something to report on that wasn't Chandra Levy.

It's a sad commentary on what humanity is like, when you realize that tragedy does sell papers and so forth.

I'm glad they're avoiding hysteria in this instance, though. I was really afraid that they wouldn't.

[identity profile] klwalton.livejournal.com 2003-02-01 10:02 am (UTC)(link)
*Well* said. Brava!

Race???

[identity profile] aerden.livejournal.com 2003-02-01 10:13 am (UTC)(link)
Someone is being crass enough to speculate about a racial component to this tragedy??! Oh, good God....

Chantal, who happens to be independent-to-Republican and a staunch supporter of the space program



Re: Race???

[identity profile] rivka.livejournal.com 2003-02-01 10:46 am (UTC)(link)
here (http://www.livejournal.com/talkread.bml?journal=cadhla&itemid=315954&thread=1032498#t1032498).

Re: Race???

[identity profile] aerden.livejournal.com 2003-02-01 01:22 pm (UTC)(link)
Rivka--Thanks for the link.

[identity profile] wcg.livejournal.com 2003-02-01 11:30 am (UTC)(link)
Yeah, there does seem to be a lot of that going 'round today.

[identity profile] elisem.livejournal.com 2003-02-01 08:49 pm (UTC)(link)
On a slightly different tack, the comment I most agree with today was what Mike Ford said about missing Richard Feynman.

Yeah.