(no subject)
Jul. 23rd, 2004 12:25 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I just made a much more personal post than usual to Respectful of Otters.
Now I'm freaking out, for reasons which make no sense. I've talked about this stuff on newsgroups and in LJ for years. What makes my blog feel so different?
Now I'm freaking out, for reasons which make no sense. I've talked about this stuff on newsgroups and in LJ for years. What makes my blog feel so different?
I think it does make sense.
Date: 2004-07-23 09:36 am (UTC)But I think it's going to be okay.
no subject
Date: 2004-07-23 09:39 am (UTC)Respectful in general feels less personal than rivka does, and I can't tell you why. It's as if respectful is the public you.
no subject
Date: 2004-07-23 09:53 am (UTC)That's exactly why I created a separate weblog.
no subject
Date: 2004-07-23 09:53 am (UTC)Still, I'm very glad you wrote what you wrote, and I suspect a lot of other people will be, too. There's one kind of good blog post that's purely rigorous intellectual analysis of a situation, but there's another, arguably even better kind of good blog post that comes from having strong feelings about a situation and thinking about those feelings enough to come to an intellectual understanding of them. What makes posts like that so valuable is that they have the power to make people both think *and* feel, and that's a wonderful thing that's all too rare.
-J
no subject
Date: 2004-07-23 09:54 am (UTC)ugh. no words here, but if an otter wanted a hug an otter could have one.
no subject
Date: 2004-07-23 10:28 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-07-23 10:02 am (UTC)I don't know if the scary is situational, but it's certainly there.
It IS a great piece
Date: 2004-07-23 10:04 am (UTC)I have a friend whose daughter has fragile X syndrome. I've been "listening" to her electronically for many years. You know, if the Prenatal Diagnosis Fairy had visited her and laid it on the line, both good and bad, I suspect she might have had an abortion. Little Abigail's suffering has so outweighed her joys that the scales would have been heavily weighted in that direction. But then, Abigail is profoundly retarded, and can never understand anything about her life. Kate becomes angry when she gets glurged at about parents of retarded children being "blessed" or "saints". I'm sure you understand that, and I'm glad you touched on it.
Thanks again.
no subject
Date: 2004-07-23 10:16 am (UTC)I am reminded of the cyclical discussions of 'why don't women blog?', which are absurd because women do blog. Often what the people asking WDWB really mean is why don't women blog the way certain big name guys do, with charts and footnotes and abstract discussions of the issues du jour?
Instead many women who blog are blogging from the sense that the personal is political. Holding a position based on graphs and statistics may work for some people. But before I can agree whole-heartedly that the minimum wage is fine where it is I want to look past the graphs at some actual people. Actual people aren't as tidy as numbers lined up in tables, but if we are going to make decisions as a society that impact people let's have the moral fortitude to look them in the face. (Pardon me, I seem to be on a soapbox. My apologies to the choir for this impromptu sermon.)
You took a big issue and you not only put a human face on it, you put your face on it. And you did it in a very public forum. It's not just good writing (which your blog is a bastion of, but I digress), it was courageous writing.
I respect the hell out of you, in the event I haven't said so recently.
no subject
Date: 2004-07-24 04:50 am (UTC)Gessi
no subject
Date: 2004-07-23 10:22 am (UTC)Re: the freakout, my guess is that blogs are meant to be read by strangers more, and you've exposed a vulernable side of yourself. Not necessarily a bad side, maybe not even one where you can be hurt, but one where, once you've said it, you have little control over the future. You've sent some powerful information out there, worked some powerful magic, and you're not sure what effect it's going to have.
Uncertainty is always a little more scary than even the worst case of certainty.
no subject
Date: 2004-07-23 10:27 am (UTC)That's exactly what it is, exactly what it feels like. Thank you. I feel like, "I don't know what people are going to do with this - and whatever they do, whether they praise it or ignore it or use it as a stick to beat abortion-seeking women with - they'll be doing it with a piece of my soul."
no subject
Date: 2004-07-23 10:40 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-07-23 11:01 am (UTC)In case you'd not guessed, you have fans... serious fans, who care.
TK
(who is, with permission) going to be pointing to this, over in his LJ).
no subject
Date: 2004-07-23 12:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-07-23 10:39 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-07-23 10:44 am (UTC)In LJ, you can decide who gets to see it.
In a newsgroup, you are using personal experience as illumination, it isn't the focus of the conversation, and as a response, you can just hack it out... no need to dither over turn of phrase, no sense that this what will first greet the reader.
So it is different.
What's the adage, "Distress doesn't mean something is wrong. Distress means something is changing,"?
TK
no subject
Date: 2004-07-23 11:31 am (UTC)I have spent years trying to find the right balance betwen my public and private life. It's not easy. And even worse, it's a constantly shifting balance.
I find it interesting that this comes so close on the heels of your mash note, which is another public/personal bridging. Are the two related?
B
no subject
Date: 2004-07-23 12:14 pm (UTC)Only in that, after the mash note, I felt a little uncomfortable talking about my physical body in a place where strangers would see it. Although a part of me was also thinking hopefully, "Maybe Mash Note Guy will see this and find it a turnoff."
Really, once I read the Ehrenreich article - and even more so, once I read the NYT article she linked to - it was inevitable that I would write about it. And it's impossible for me to have a non-personal reaction to a topic this close to me.
no subject
Date: 2004-07-23 12:26 pm (UTC)B
no subject
Date: 2004-07-23 03:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-07-24 05:00 am (UTC)This is why I am wondering about a connection between the e-mail you received and your post. Both are about the line moving. In the first, the line moved around you. In the second, you moved it.
B
no subject
Date: 2004-07-23 02:42 pm (UTC)i'm proud to know you.
no subject
Date: 2004-07-23 05:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-07-23 08:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-07-24 01:40 am (UTC)