Rescinding the Corvette offer.
Dec. 5th, 2005 09:23 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
This morning I turned on the TV to a cooking show while I was eating my breakfast.
Alex clapped for Rachael Ray. Okay, so she's been strangely interested in Rachael Ray for a while - but sheesh, so much for my unbelievable specialness. I still love her to pieces, but now she can just wait for Rachael to buy her a Corvette.
A brief digression about Alex and TV:
Yes, we know that the American Academy of Pediatrics recommends no TV at all before age two because of concerns about its effects on development. I am utterly unconvinced by the putative TV-ADHD connection, and beyond that, the primary concern about TV in babyhood is that it crowds out activities with a higher developmental payoff, such as playing, interacting with other people, and being active. That's definitely a valid concern, but it seems most relevant for families where the TV is always on and kids are planted in front of it for long periods of time. That doesn't describe our household.
That said, we try to limit Alex's TV exposure in sensible ways. We watch most of our TV when she's sleeping. If the TV's on when she's awake, we try to arrange ourselves and her toys so that she's not facing the screen. (Other things being equal, she prefers to face us.) We don't turn on any children's television; I also avoid anything violent or graphic and anything with a lot of quick cuts. That pretty much leaves televised baseball and poker, cooking shows, decorating shows, West Wing reruns, and the occasional documentary. And we usually watch things on TiVO, which means that we can skip the commercials. Mostly she ignores the TV... but she does seem to like watching 30 Minute Meals with Rachael Ray.
Alex clapped for Rachael Ray. Okay, so she's been strangely interested in Rachael Ray for a while - but sheesh, so much for my unbelievable specialness. I still love her to pieces, but now she can just wait for Rachael to buy her a Corvette.
A brief digression about Alex and TV:
Yes, we know that the American Academy of Pediatrics recommends no TV at all before age two because of concerns about its effects on development. I am utterly unconvinced by the putative TV-ADHD connection, and beyond that, the primary concern about TV in babyhood is that it crowds out activities with a higher developmental payoff, such as playing, interacting with other people, and being active. That's definitely a valid concern, but it seems most relevant for families where the TV is always on and kids are planted in front of it for long periods of time. That doesn't describe our household.
That said, we try to limit Alex's TV exposure in sensible ways. We watch most of our TV when she's sleeping. If the TV's on when she's awake, we try to arrange ourselves and her toys so that she's not facing the screen. (Other things being equal, she prefers to face us.) We don't turn on any children's television; I also avoid anything violent or graphic and anything with a lot of quick cuts. That pretty much leaves televised baseball and poker, cooking shows, decorating shows, West Wing reruns, and the occasional documentary. And we usually watch things on TiVO, which means that we can skip the commercials. Mostly she ignores the TV... but she does seem to like watching 30 Minute Meals with Rachael Ray.
no subject
Date: 2005-12-05 02:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-12-05 03:09 pm (UTC)She almost never sees *us* watching TV, and what she does watch doesn't seem to cause her to sit vegetatively in front of it - unless she's tired or ill, in which case she's much more likely to fall asleep if she's sitting still than if she's romping actively. TV *is* a lot more passive for her than "reading" books, but then, it was for me, too - I never sat still to read until I started school and was taught to sit still on demand. Even then, at home, I watched TV while lying still on the floor - and read books while moving a lot, on the floor, in chairs, etc. I think it's because books can move with me.
no subject
Date: 2005-12-05 03:40 pm (UTC)My parents' strategy was to keep the TV in a location that was slightly outside of our normal traffic patterns. Then they let us watch as much as we wanted. The idea was that watching TV would have to be an intentional choice, rather than just a default here-it-is-in-front-of me activity.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2005-12-05 03:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-12-05 03:15 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2005-12-05 03:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-12-05 03:10 pm (UTC)As a baby, Casper was not very interested in TV at all. I know a family whose infant was a pretty big fan of John Kerry, though - perked up whenever he came on screen during the election season!
no subject
Date: 2005-12-05 03:16 pm (UTC)30 Minute Meals is on during the "Mama's completely worn out" pre-bedtime hour, which is why she's seen it more than once.
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2005-12-05 03:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-12-05 03:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-12-05 03:40 pm (UTC)Although the other morning the news was on, and they were featuring a dog that needs a family to adopt him, and he looked at the TV and said "Dog!"
no subject
Date: 2005-12-05 03:52 pm (UTC)way right now but after reading the
top portion of the post (about Racheal Ray buying Alex a Corvette) I have "Loooord won't you buy me a Mercaaaaades Benz" stuck in my head.
no subject
Date: 2005-12-05 04:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-12-05 04:14 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2005-12-05 04:18 pm (UTC)My beef is with the parents who think that tv is a good thing, and the more their kids watch, the better off they are. Hogwash. I know a woman who thinks that her 4 month old will grow up to be very smart because she pops her in front of the history channel a couple of hours a day. Huh?
I'm also with you on the "children's television". I have a few issues with it. Again, like the history channel, Baby Einstein isn't going to make your kid smarter. Secondly, there's often a lot of background noise, and individual voices cannot be discerned. Thirdly, if they're cartoons, or their mouths are otherwise hidden, again the speech communication is difficult for babies to understand. Alex is probably learning a lot more from Rachael Ray, because she can see her mouth, than she would from that show with the jumping poofballs.
There's also a high percentage of children under 2 with tvs in their rooms. Whaaa? I think that's insane.
As a sidenote, I've been reading a lot about sleep, ADHD, and TV. There was one study that found a link between tv and ADHD. There are studies that have found a link between tv and lack of sleep. There are also studies that have shown a correlation between sleep deprivation and ADHD. Interesting, sez I.
no subject
Date: 2005-12-05 04:41 pm (UTC)I stay away from children's TV because it's specifically designed to catch and hold Alex's attention. I don't want her paying attention to TV at this age. And no WAY do I want her watching the commercials that go with children's TV.
There was one study that found a link between tv and ADHD.
Is that the big study that appeared in the journal Pediatrics last year? If you click on the words "utterly unconvinced" in the post above, you'll see my critical review of that study. If you're talking about something else, I'd love it if you could pass on a link or citation.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2005-12-05 04:52 pm (UTC)Gah!
See, just when I think I'm doing a good job of being nonjudgmental about other people's parenting styles, I come across something like that. What the hell?
The Feeding Infants and Toddlers Study is another prime source of parenting OMGWTF. For example:
- Soda is being served to infants as young as seven months old.
- In any given day, one third of toddlers 19-24 months are not consuming a vegetable and nearly 20 percent are not consuming any fruit.
- French fries are the most commonly consumed vegetable for toddlers aged 15-24 months.
- By 19-24 months, most toddlers consumed sweets, desserts or salty snacks at least once a day.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:Uh-oh, guess I'm a bad mom ;-)
From:Re: Uh-oh, guess I'm a bad mom ;-)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:Blender & Baby Food
From:Re: Blender & Baby Food
From:no subject
Date: 2005-12-05 07:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-12-05 04:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-12-05 05:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-12-05 07:27 pm (UTC)MKK
no subject
Date: 2005-12-05 07:46 pm (UTC)He's soooo dreamy. ;-)
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2005-12-05 10:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-12-06 06:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-12-06 04:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-12-06 06:02 pm (UTC)McSweeney's
Date: 2005-12-07 04:00 am (UTC)To excerpt: Heh.
no subject
Date: 2005-12-07 12:56 pm (UTC)My nephew, age 4, is also very taken with Rachael Ray, and after doing some research, it appears she is VERY popular with the pre-nursery-school set. We think it has to do with her mannerisms and personality; she's very bubbly and animated, with a big smile, expressive hands, and a clear voice. She comes across like a friendly, kind, young teacher -- and plenty of little kids develop crushes on them, too. ;-)
Rachael's been asked about it in interviews -- apparently toddlers go rushing up to her at book signings and the like -- and she's a little bewildered by the attention. But they're a big fanbase for her! She even put out a kid's cookbook this year; I got one for my nephew. Kinda lame, though.
no subject
Date: 2005-12-08 06:37 pm (UTC)That could explain why so many adults find her annoying, as well. ;-)
It's good to know it's not just Alex. That is funny, though! Nickelodeon should hire her away from the Food Network to host a children's show.