(no subject)
Of all our homeschooling practices, writing instruction is where I've differed most from the modern educational standard. As I understand it, in a standard elementary school children are expected to produce large quantities of expressive writing, starting in kindergarten with "journals" composed with inventive spelling. One local parent told me that children in her son's kindergarten class were writing full paragraphs by the end of the year. The reams of writing continue, most of it on the topic of personal experiences. The five paragraph essay format, which I learned in seventh grade, is now apparently expected beginning in third grade.
In contrast, we did... none of that. Alex copied well-formed sentences, and later took dictation from them. She listened to passages of material and summarized them verbally. She studied spelling and the formal grammar of sentences. And above all else, she was exposed to well-written books. She read them herself, and I read aloud from books that were more complex. It was a complete departure from how her friends in public school were learning to write, and it made me very, very nervous at times. In third grade, supposedly five-paragraph-essay time, Alex began writing the occasional short paragraph. Very occasional. They were short and excruciating for her to write. I tried my best to keep trusting the method.
Now she's in fourth grade. She just turned in this essay:

So I'm feeling vindicated in our writing methods. Yes, there's a lot that could be done to improve this essay - but I don't think that four years' experience producing reams and reams of (realistically speaking) poor-quality material would fall into that category. I just don't think it's necessary to introduce higher academic skills earlier and earlier and earlier. You can just wait until those skills are developmentally appropriate, and start then - in the meantime, filling a child's time with activities which are developmentally appropriate, such as listening to increasingly complex literature.
In contrast, we did... none of that. Alex copied well-formed sentences, and later took dictation from them. She listened to passages of material and summarized them verbally. She studied spelling and the formal grammar of sentences. And above all else, she was exposed to well-written books. She read them herself, and I read aloud from books that were more complex. It was a complete departure from how her friends in public school were learning to write, and it made me very, very nervous at times. In third grade, supposedly five-paragraph-essay time, Alex began writing the occasional short paragraph. Very occasional. They were short and excruciating for her to write. I tried my best to keep trusting the method.
Now she's in fourth grade. She just turned in this essay:

So I'm feeling vindicated in our writing methods. Yes, there's a lot that could be done to improve this essay - but I don't think that four years' experience producing reams and reams of (realistically speaking) poor-quality material would fall into that category. I just don't think it's necessary to introduce higher academic skills earlier and earlier and earlier. You can just wait until those skills are developmentally appropriate, and start then - in the meantime, filling a child's time with activities which are developmentally appropriate, such as listening to increasingly complex literature.
no subject
P.
no subject
It must be incredibly difficult to trust you are doing the right thing, but I think that yeah, whatever you're doing works: keep doing it.
no subject
As for Elena, she loooooooves adjectives. We'll see how she does with logical reasoning. :)
no subject
no subject
I recently re-read Laura Ingalls Wilder's These Happy Golden Years. She gets her first assignment to write a composition when she's 15 and has already worked as a teacher!
no subject
So SO impressed -- congrads to both of you!
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
An incident, when a friend of mine was living in Leeds, might also remind us all that we might be exceptional. His was a typical fannish home, packed with books. His daughter came home from school with a new friend. The new friend was astonished by the sight of the bookshelves. I suspect that the household had more books than the school.
It's likely part of the reason why fannish kids come across as so smart. It's more than just the reading, it's the nature of good SF&F, the way it builds on knowledge. You get things, such as battles, which seem to happen in an odd way, and then you realise that the sequence of events comes from a real battle out of the history books, and you start looking at history, which is far more than just battles.
no subject