(no subject)
Jun. 20th, 2002 06:17 pmWhat attracted me to LJ was the idea of writing about anything that interests me at the moment, without worrying about whether it's interesting to other people or appropriate to a particular locale. It's true that I'm aware of my audience - at first I tried not to have one, by not telling anyone I was keeping an online journal - but it's also true that I feel freed by the opt-in nature of LJ. If you're not interested in what I write, why are you reading my journal?, I ask my inner critic when it accuses me of being boring or precious or self-involved. And my inner critic has to shut up.
It occurs to me that while this is a feature to me, a LJ writer, to many LJ readers it's probably something more like a bug.
This post brought to you by a debate in alt.polyamory.
It occurs to me that while this is a feature to me, a LJ writer, to many LJ readers it's probably something more like a bug.
This post brought to you by a debate in alt.polyamory.
no subject
Date: 2002-06-20 03:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2002-06-21 06:13 am (UTC)We've lost six or seven people that way already this week.