(no subject)
Jun. 20th, 2002 06:17 pmWhat attracted me to LJ was the idea of writing about anything that interests me at the moment, without worrying about whether it's interesting to other people or appropriate to a particular locale. It's true that I'm aware of my audience - at first I tried not to have one, by not telling anyone I was keeping an online journal - but it's also true that I feel freed by the opt-in nature of LJ. If you're not interested in what I write, why are you reading my journal?, I ask my inner critic when it accuses me of being boring or precious or self-involved. And my inner critic has to shut up.
It occurs to me that while this is a feature to me, a LJ writer, to many LJ readers it's probably something more like a bug.
This post brought to you by a debate in alt.polyamory.
It occurs to me that while this is a feature to me, a LJ writer, to many LJ readers it's probably something more like a bug.
This post brought to you by a debate in alt.polyamory.
no subject
Date: 2002-06-20 03:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2002-06-20 03:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2002-06-20 03:44 pm (UTC)LJ isn't a newsgroup isn't a mailing list isn't e-mail isn't chat.
I use all of these (well, not chat; it's not my cuppa) for different reasons, only some of which fall into the "keeping in touch with friends" category. Although what drew me to LJ in the first place was, admittedly, the presence of some good friends I don't much "see" elsewhere any more.
Now that I'm here, I find it an interesting hybrid between a "real" (i.e., paper) journal and a conversation with friends. It doesn't replace the other forums I frequent, it adds to them - for me, anyway, and that's really what counts.
The opt in nature of LJ
Date: 2002-06-20 03:52 pm (UTC)I also use it to keep track of stuff happening to me as well a way to let friends know what's up with me.
I find LJ easier to deal with then newsgroups. alt.c and alt.poly get overwhelming often.
Re: The opt in nature of LJ
Date: 2002-06-20 04:25 pm (UTC)I just do not have the time to read through the newsgroups these days. Oh, I might pull them up to look for specific people, but even then I won't read all the posts by my more loquacious friends. Here, I can look at the friends page once or twice a day, and that lets me know if something's going on with a bunch of people. If there's something that specifically touches on me, I know I'll probably get e-mail about it, or a phone call, or somesuch. But here I can keep a finger on the pulse
no subject
Date: 2002-06-20 06:47 pm (UTC)The facts that it also gives me a space to rant about random things and have some potential for feedback and lets me keep track of friends (I discovered the journals of some friends of mine, and I'm getting the blow-by-blow of their pregnancy now, for example) are mostly bonus.
no subject
Date: 2002-06-20 10:00 pm (UTC)Re:
Date: 2002-06-21 04:34 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2002-06-21 06:13 am (UTC)We've lost six or seven people that way already this week.
no subject
Date: 2002-06-21 06:15 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2002-06-21 07:16 am (UTC)I write what I want, where I want. Little of it is hidden. But that doesn't mean everyone has the right to have it in the form they find most convenient.
Of course, you know I'd say that, because you've seen me comment on this over in alt.poly. Where I have thus far resisted the urge to point out to Aahz that I might equally well say that he is depriving the denizens of rassef, where he no longer posts, of his input.
Jo, who is a close friend and oddly squicked by online journals, does get email that covers some of the same stuff I put here. But that's my choice--she hasn't demanded it, only mentioned that she doesn't read LJ.
why I read
Date: 2002-06-21 11:30 am (UTC)Hey I loaded up some of my own pictures on jigzone
http://www.jigzone.com/ms/g.php?ua=269731a85763