(no subject)

[rivka]

What attracted me to LJ was the idea of writing about anything that interests me at the moment, without worrying about whether it's interesting to other people or appropriate to a particular locale. It's true that I'm aware of my audience - at first I tried not to have one, by not telling anyone I was keeping an online journal - but it's also true that I feel freed by the opt-in nature of LJ. If you're not interested in what I write, why are you reading my journal?, I ask my inner critic when it accuses me of being boring or precious or self-involved. And my inner critic has to shut up.

It occurs to me that while this is a feature to me, a LJ writer, to many LJ readers it's probably something more like a bug.

This post brought to you by a debate in alt.polyamory.

Comments

[mactavish.livejournal.com]

I really like you, and I like the way you say things, and I'd want to read your journal even if it were just self-indulgence and tripe. And it isn't.

[rivka.livejournal.com]

Awwww. Thanks, Mary. It's a pity you live all the way out on that other coast. Is it time for ap9 yet?