rivka: (colin)
Colin turned four months old last week, and yesterday he had his four-month well baby visit. He is in fine form: happy, healthy, sociable, strong.

He is such a cheerful, amiable baby. When he wakes up in the morning he just beams at me. He loves to make eye contact and smile. He loves having people talk to him - not just familiar family members, but total strangers. He laughs a lot, an irresistable gurgling chuckle. He rarely cries or fusses, unless we're cruel enough to ask him to ride in the car.

He's a very vocal baby. Still not a great variety of sounds, of course - it's mostly lots of big open aaahhs and ohhhhs, with some /g/ and /b/ sounds thrown in. But he vocalizes a lot. He'll make a lot of noise even by himself, playing with his baby gym, but if you hold him face-to-face he coos away conversationally with great intensity.

Of course at four months he can grab and hold things and put things in his mouth. Baby toys have finally become objects of interest. He isn't particularly adept at handling things, but he does have a killer grip.

He's got great muscle tone. He loves to "stand" on our laps and makes frequent attempts to scale the north face of Mount Mama. When we put him on his stomach, he lifts his whole upper body with ease. He can roll over front-to-back. And he's got a powerful kick. Last night at dinner I had him nursing in the sling, and he kicked out one leg hard enough that it knocked Alex's water glass clear off the table.

Speaking of nursing, it's so easy now. In normal circumstances during the day he nurses for maybe 15 minutes every two hours. He latches himself on with verve, drinks until he's full, and then either unlatches and smiles at me to let me know that it's playtime again or else falls peacefully asleep. I do have to be careful, though, because he is not fussy about the targets he chooses for his remora-like latch and he's been known to give me painful hickeys if he misses the nipple. (I know, TMI, sorry.)

Sleep is starting to fall apart a bit, as we've hit the four month sleep regression, but even so it's not too bad. He usually goes down "for the night" around 9:30. I swaddle him tightly and keep him swaddled until morning. From 9:30 to around 7:30, he wakes only to nurse and goes straight back to sleep after he nurses, and during that time he can usually be easily put down in his swing or the cosleeper. Before the sleep regression he was giving me one 5-6 hour stretch and then sleeping for two-hour stretches until morning. Now, I'd say that I get one 4-5 hour stretch and then one- to two-hour stretches until morning, with at least one episode per night of being hard to put down. Which, again, is not so bad. I think things might go a bit more smoothly when the giant-but-thin-muslin swaddling cloths I ordered arrive - they should be more suitable for a larger baby and for summer sleep.

He's working on cutting a tooth. Or teeth. Drool flows copiously, and he likes to chew on things. He keeps his fingers in his mouth a lot, and chews on our hands and on toys. He hasn't seemed to show a lot of teething pain - just drooliness and chewiness. Let's hope that continues.

He loves Alex. She often makes him laugh, and he likes to lie on a blanket and watch her play. She has a special talking-to-Colin voice - hilariously, she will often repeat things I tell him using the special voice, as if she's translating - and hearing it really makes him smile. Unfortunately, one of the things he likes most about Alex is the way he can grab her hair in a death grip. She is remarkably tolerant of him... although she did suggest to me this morning that we put him up for adoption.

So, all in all, we're having a great time with babyhood here. Yay.
rivka: (panda pile)
Man, I blink, and suddenly it's been a week since I posted to LJ. I'm sorry. I know that in my current state of craziness there are people who worry if I don't post.

The Wild Women gathered again this weekend. This time was mellower - we all met at one person's house in the DC suburbs, went out for Indian food and then ice cream, stayed overnight, and decamped before church the next day. We drank prosecco and beer and wine and ate hummus and pretzels and raw veggies and bagels and hazelnut chocolates. And we talked and talked and talked.

Colin came along, which just shows how awesome my friends are. I knew this group of women would never pressure me to leave an infant, but I did figure that I'd be missing out on gatherings until Colin was old enough to be left with Michael overnight. It turns out that I seem to have been the only one with that expectation. Colin flirted happily with the Wild Women, who passed him around and got drooled on and speculated about whether they were really 100% done having babies.

When I was younger, I was almost exclusively friends with men. (Or, if we go back as far as high school, boys.) I always seemed to fit in better among men, and their ways seemed easier to understand. Honestly, the performance of femininity kind of scared me - I knew I was lousy at it, and I expected other women to judge me and find me wanting. I gradually started to have more female friends when I became involved in fandom and usenet, and in recent years I've been fortunate enough to have lots of great women in my life. But I never imagined that I'd have a group of girlfriends like this. I would've predicted that I would feel awkward, say the wrong thing, not be understood, miss signals, be rejected. Instead, being with the Wild Women feels like coming home.

I am really lucky.
rivka: (smite)
I almost never drive to work because parking is such an issue. But today I had my shrink appointment, so I drove. Came back and parked across the street from my office. This is a major thoroughfare, no rush hour parking allowed, and many's the time I've seen tow trucks lined up at the corner at 3:55, waiting to tow the unpunctual or unwary.

But I figured, no problem, I'd move my car by four. It was the only spot I could find, anyway.

I went in to work. Drama happened. Extensively. I did my best to negotiate around the drama without getting any stuck to me. I pumped. I did some work. At 4:30, I packed up my things and, as I always do, walked briskly to the light rail. I was a block away from the light rail stop when I remembered that I had driven to work, and where I had left my car.

Futilely, I turned around and walked all the way back, just on the tiniest million-to-one chance that it hadn't yet been towed. Of course it had. I trudged back to the light rail. Two trains roared past, one after the other, while I was a block or so away.

I stood on the platform, dejected. As I waited for the next train, the temperature dropped by about fifteen degrees. Black clouds rolled in on the chilly wind. Lightning flickered, first in the distance, then quite close up. The first drops of rain fell just as I got on the train. By the time I got off, lightning was flashing all around, thunder close at its heels, chilly needles of rain whipping in as I struggled to keep the wind from blowing the umbrella out of my hand.

Awfully convenient thunderstorm. If my life were a book, I would be rolling my eyes right now and muttering about the pathetic fallacy.

Oh dear.

Jun. 9th, 2009 09:22 am
rivka: (Baltimore)
We live a few doors down from a kink shop.

It's actually a nice, tasteful, well-stocked shop with friendly and helpful staff, and they're fine neighbors. The only problem is that the shop is at basement level. Which means that their display window starts at ground level, i.e., toddler/preschooler eye level.

They used to regularly have window displays of stuffed animals in bondage gear. It's been a while since I've noticed something like that, so either they've moved away from that design technique or, now that Alex isn't a toddler anymore, I'm not spending quite so much time inching along the sidewalk looking at every conceivable thing there is to see.

But they do still display wares in their window. Alex has asked about it, and I've told her, in my best off-hand voice, that the store sells things for grownups who like to play dress-up. That's satisfied her.

This weekend she got a bag of dress-up clothes for $2 at a yard sale. It's been an exciting new treat; we didn't previously have dress-up clothes at home.

You see where this is going, right?

This morning I explained that this will be her first day of coming home from school at lunchtime to stay with Colin and our new nanny. I encouraged her to be friendly and helpful to the nanny "because she's new at our house."

"Okay!" Alex said cheerfully. "And if she wants to play dress-up with me, she can go to the store that has things for grown-ups who like to play dress-up."

...

...I was so pleased with myself for giving her that explanation, too.
rivka: (colin)
Colin had his follow-up imaging and neurosurgeon visit today. Everything is fine. Totally fine. His ventricles (fluid-filled spaces within the brain) are normal-sized. He does still have fluid buildup at the back of his brain, in between the brain and the skull. The doctor said it's an arachnoid cyst, and harmless. We don't need to follow up.

There is a possibility that someday the cyst will grow and cause headaches, but if that happens, draining it is a reasonably uncomplicated procedure. Most people with arachnoid cysts never have symptoms and never need treatment.

We weren't all that worried, waiting for the follow-up, because the initial visit was so positive and because he seems so on-track developmentally. But it's still a relief to get the all-clear.

Marriage.

Jun. 7th, 2009 09:20 pm
rivka: (alex age 3.5)
Alex knows our position on marriage equality. We have a sign in our window that says Civil Marriage is a Civil Right, and after she asked us to explain the sign a couple of times she started to be able to explain it on her own.

"Some people think that boys should only marry girls and girls should only marry boys. But we don't believe that, right, Mom?"

Sometimes she will add a bit of her own, suggesting that maybe people who think that boys should only marry girls will come past our house, see our sign, and change their minds. I like her optimism.

A month or two ago, she asked me, "How come Zoe's mother and father have the same last name?" I explained, thinking how cool it was that, to Alex, that isn't the default.

But it turns out that when you're four years old it's hard to really get a grasp on the concept of marriage. Today, in the car coming home from the grocery store, Alex's little voice piped up:

"Some people think that you can only get married if you have the same last name. But we don't believe that, right, Mom?"
rivka: (Rivka and Misha)
Ten years ago today, on June 5, 1999, Michael and I were married.

I remember that when my undergraduate advisor got married, she told me that she recommended that all her students live together first, because then "marriage is exactly like things were before, except that you have more stuff." But it turned out that I didn't feel that way at all. After Michael and I married, I felt profoundly different. I had a deep sense of security and peace.

From the very first weeks that I knew Michael, I was aware that there was something about our relationship that made him different from, well, everyone else I ever dated. I felt that no matter how different we were in background, experiences, or outlook, at the bedrock level of fundamental values and axioms we were the same. In the ten years we've been married, the twelve years we've been together, he has never given me that stepping-off-a-cliff sensation of "you are totally alien to me." We have disagreements, but I have total faith that at the core we are in agreement about what is important and what is right. Michael understands me like no one else ever has. I trust him as I've never trusted anyone else.

If we hadn't found each other, who would we be? I wouldn't be a UU. He wouldn't live in Baltimore. I wouldn't understand why the designated hitter rule is a travesty. He would still think of sushi as "bait." We wouldn't have Alex or Colin. Our lives would be unrecognizably different.

It's not so easy to be us these days. We're under a lot of stress. But we've got each other's backs, and I think we both have faith that this family we're building is good.

Happy Anniversary, Michael.
rivka: (phrenological head)
Last night we went to our first homeschooling event. It was billed as a "curriculum fair;" it turned out to be a massive flea market for homeschooling families to get rid of old books, curricula, games, software, resources, et cetera. (There were workshops, too, but we skipped them because they didn't seem like a good fit.) Everything I saw was very cheap, and it was nice to be able to chat a bit about how people had used things.

The biggest thing we learned is to get a babysitter next time. It was in Annapolis, which is a long way to go in after-work traffic, and when we got there the church where it was being held was swelteringly hot. Alex alternated between desperately needing everything she saw and whining that she didn't want to look at anything else. I would've liked to have more time to page through potential resources, consult with Michael, and sift through the big bins of fiction books. Oh well. There will be more.

The sponsoring group was a fundamentalist Christian homeschooling group, and, well. Mixed in with the sane resources on the various tables would be things like Astronomy God's Way. There's a good-sized secular homeschooling organization in Baltimore, so we won't be dependent on these folks for an ongoing social network. Which is good, because there's only so much biting my tongue that I can do.

At any rate, we came home with loot! )
rivka: (Baltimore)
Michael's company owns four season tickets to the Baltimore Orioles. The partners get first dibs on them, for personal use or business entertaining, but the rest of the staff can put their names in for any unclaimed tickets. Michael won a pair of tickets for Sunday afternoon's game.

We'd been meaning to take Alex to her first ballgame sometime this summer, and this seemed like the perfect opportunity. She sang "Take Me Out to the Ballgame" all the way from church to the light rail stop, and from the light rail to the stadium.

They were good seats. Right at third base. On the club level, where you can order food and have it brought to your seat or visit a dedicated club-level concession stand. Club level, where the concourse is air-conditioned and has couches and big-screen TVs in case you want to cool off without missing any of the game. Club level, where the bathrooms are clean. I had never been up there before. We got to walk past the private box with the presidential seal on the door.

We had figured that third-base club-level seating would be shaded. Unfortunately, when we came out from the concourse we discovered that the first three rows were sunny, and our seats were right in the first row. But I didn't even have time to start worrying about the sun. (Colin is too young to use sunscreen.) As soon as the usher caught sight of us, he bustled over. "Your seats are... okay, let's put you up here. We may need to move you around a little, but we'll keep that baby in the shade. Your seats should be shaded after the first inning." (They actually weren't shaded until the fourth, but there were plenty of unclaimed seats in our section, so we had no trouble staying in the shade until then.)

I settled in to my seat and started to nurse Colin. Moments later, the usher came over and started talking to Michael. I saw him point at us and cringed, thinking that he was probably telling Michael I couldn't nurse there. But in fact he was saying: "Is this the baby's first game? Be sure to stop by the concierge desk - they'll give him a certificate."

Awww.

The game moved along pretty briskly, because neither team could hit a damn thing. (The O's eventually solved that problem by putting Danys Baez in as a relief picher. Everyone can hit off him.) I had been prepared to ditch the game in mid-progress, but Alex actually lasted until the very end. Colin had a less-good time - he was fussy, wanted to sleep, couldn't sleep. It might have just been too hot for him.

I had a barbecue sandwich and a really tasty beer. We admired the new scoreboard (Okay, it's not new. We just haven't been to a game in years.) and enjoyed the city view beyond the outfield. It was a very pleasant afternoon.
rivka: (chalice)
Yesterday's church service featured the youth who have just completed a semester-long Coming of Age program. They've used classes, journalling exercises, retreats, group discussions, and one-on-one work with adult mentors to mark the passage from childhood to maturity. Ours is a noncreedal religion, meaning that there is no common set of beliefs or spiritual path that we all share. So one of the markers of the passage out of childhood, for Unitarian-Universalists, is that one is expected to take on the "free and responsible search for truth and meaning" for oneself, as an active process.

As the centerpiece of the service, each of the seven Coming of Age youth stood before the congregation and delivered their own personal faith statement: a description of what they believe and where they stand on spiritual matters. Obviously this isn't expected to be the final word, but they are expected to think deeply and make a sincere declaration.

They. Were. Amazing.

One of them flatly asserted that the physical world is all that there is, and that there is nothing that cannot be explained in material terms. One of them explained how she came to identify human love as a transcendent higher power. One described her belief that, because matter and energy cannot be created or destroyed, she is made from dinosaurs and will live on forever as components of living creatures to come. One said that the only thing he was sure he believed in was the search. One said, straightforwardly, that he'd watched all his friends have insights over the course of the class, but he hadn't, and he still didn't know what he believed.

Every one of them stood up, head held high, in front of a hundred and fifty people, and had the self-confidence and self-knowledge to articulate their faith. It was inspiring to hear them. It was wonderful to see them radiant in the light of the congregation's enthusiastic applause. And it's a bit terrifying to think that in about ten years, my daughter will be standing in the pulpit and Coming of Age herself.

I love my religious community. I have so much respect for these youth - four of them were in my OWL class last year, and I can't believe how much they've matured over the last year and a half. And I am in awe of my friends who helped them on their Coming of Age journey this year, including [livejournal.com profile] acceberskoorb and [livejournal.com profile] lynsaurus.
rivka: (panda pile)
I have good friends.
rivka: (psych help)
I don't interpret dreams, as a therapist, but sometimes even I have to admit that my subconscious is talking to me with a twenty-foot-tall neon sign. Last night I dreamed that mice infested our fridge and chewed holes in the bags of breastmilk I have stored in there. There you go: most of my current inadequacies rolled up neatly into a two-minute dream sequence. Our dirty house, our mouse problem (of which I am incredibly ashamed), pumping, Colin being okay while I'm at work...

I don't know why I've been treating this like a secret, but.

I have a postpartum anxiety disorder. It mostly manifests as intense feelings of guilt, shame, and inadequacy, with a lot of focus on other people probably thinking I'm horrible and some tendencies toward obsessive thinking.

I am in treatment, and coming up on the point where the Prozac is supposed to kick in.

Right now it's very hard for me to use my LJ. I'm pretty caught up in the inside of my head, and the last thing I want to do is write about that, but the truth is that whenever I think about posting something I picture people disapproving of me or judging me for it. So I'll post about the kids because it's a safe topic and then I'll think that most of you probably despise me for being so wrapped up in my children that I've erased my own life from my LJ, or else you think I'm a horrible mother who puts academic pressure on Alex because I posted about teaching her to read, and I could write about the new nanny but then what if she leaves like the last one did and that just proves what a failure I am and... well. You get the picture.

I feel ridiculous even saying all this but that's where things are with me right now.
rivka: (phrenological head)
I feel like Alex has been on the cusp of reading for so long. She's known all the letters and letter sounds for a long time. She's had a handful of sight words, mostly names, since she was two. There have been a number of times that Michael and I have wondered if she can read, because she's displayed unexpected knowledge of text.

I've more or less come to the conclusion that she can't. She has a good memory, as preliterate children often do; she memorizes books and can recite them back after surprisingly few readings. And she has a very good ability to guess a word based on the context and the initial letter. Those two things, combined, often seem like reading. But she doesn't seem to get phonics at all. When asked to sound out a simple CVC (consonant-vowel-consonant) word, she has a lot of trouble doing it - or even "saying the word fast" after we've helped her isolate the individual letter sounds.

I've often heard people say that reading is developmental; that it's not just a matter of collecting the right set of skills, but an actual process of cognitive maturation. And that does seem consistent with what we're seeing. Alex has the skills, but it's like the switch in her brain hasn't yet flipped to allow her to pull them together.

There's no hurry, obviously. Teaching reading seems hard, and I don't really want to do it - I've been hoping she'd learn on her own, the way Michael and I did. I let her play on Starfall sometimes when she asks for a computer game, and sometimes when she asks me what something says I'll encourage her to try sounding it out, but I don't feel any strong compulsion to propel her along the path to reading.

Except that lately she's been asking for reading lessons.

I've been writing CVC words on her Magnadoodle and asking her to sound them out. And she's been hitting a wall - not wanting to try, or guessing based on the first letter and getting sulky when encouraged to try again. I'll offer that the reading lesson can be over, and she doesn't want it to be. But the method hasn't been working.

Then yesterday she decided that she wanted to have some turns giving me a reading lesson. She was actually able to construct a few CVC words on her own for me to read, and it seemed much lower-stress for her than trying to decode my words. So I decided I was going about it all wrong.

Today when she wanted a reading lesson, I took the Magnadoodle and drew three pictures: a sun, a car, and a cup. "Pick one of these words, and let's see if you can write it." I gave her the option of having me write the letters or doing it herself, and she decided to do it herself.

In just a couple of minutes, the Magnadoodle read SON CAR CUP. No hesitation, no reluctance to try, no difficulty isolating the letter sounds. She went on to successfully write MAN and PIN in response to additional pictures before getting tired.

Looks like I've had the whole phonics thing backwards. I should've offered her writing lessons.
rivka: (Rivka & kids)
Me: Can I have six of your shrimp?
Alex: If you eat six of my shrimp, then I'll have none.
Me: And that's not okay?
Alex: No. (eats two shrimp.)
Me: Can I have four of your shrimp?
Alex: (fixing me with a clear, earnest gaze.) Mom, you should treat others the way you want to be treated. Would you like it if someone asked if they could have four of your shrimp?
Me: That does it. No more Sunday School for you.
rivka: (phrenological head)
Alex and I have continued to do intermittent math play with Cuisenaire rods.

She has a great grasp now of how the rods relate to each other. This seems to have developed through casual free play and building. She had initially backed off from the game where you put two rods together and try to add something to the shorter rod to make it equal the longer one, because she was afraid it would be hard. Now she breezes through it.

sevenplusthree
(This picture shows 10 = 7 +3)

I told her I was going to solve one a new way, by trying to find two rods that made up the gap. As soon as I picked up the first one she told me what the second one should be. Then she suggested that we should find all the different ways of doing it, but we got distracted after only three possible solutions.

possible_solutions

I hadn't introduced the number names for the rods to Alex, but when my father was visiting I showed the rods to him. He picked up an orange rod and asked if it was "ten," and started trying to make an ordered row. After I gave him a couple and assigned them numbers, Alex jumped right in with "Here's six" and "Here's five." So apparently she grasped the correspondence without having it taught.

After a little while she laughed and said, "How come we're calling them by numbers?"

"That's an interesting question," I said. "I need a bunch of white ones to answer it." (White rods are unit rods - they're one cubic centimeter.) I reached for some, but she was way ahead of me. "So an orange is ten, and it's the same as ten white rods," she said.

Uh, yeah. Never mind about that demonstration, then. That's the cool thing about Cuisenaire rods to me - it really seems like an intuitive grasp of mathematical relationships arises just from playing with them.

We've done a little more playing with rods-as-numbers, including making demonstration "staircases" showing that each size of rod is one white-rod longer than the next. I showed her that you can also make a staircase of rods that differ from each other by a red rod, which is "two." And, because it seemed to flow from this, I showed that you could ask questions like "how many red rods does it take to make a dark green?" (2 * x = 6) and "now, how many light greens does it take to make a dark green?" (3 * x = 6)

Of course, what Alex does with the rods more than anything else is things like this:

rod_sunflower
rivka: (travel)
I haven't been posting very much about my life lately, have I? I'm here, and okay. I'm just feeling quiet.

I never wrote up the trip I took last weekend, and tomorrow we're heading out again. We're going to Memphis to introduce Colin to Michael's father.

Have a good weekend, everybody. Maybe by the time I get back I'll have something to say.

ZOMG.

May. 21st, 2009 02:23 pm
rivka: (druggie horses)
In this week's Baltimore City Paper - and not in the back with the phone sex ads, but in the front section, next to an article about free factory tours as summer entertainment - there is a large quarter-page ad:

"Finding great health care shouldn't be torture. Even if you're into that."

There's a graphic of a pair of handcuffs. And then a blurb explaining that "Chase Brexton is proud to offer a full spectrum of care in an open, comforting environment," and specifying the services they provide: medical care, dental care, mental health counseling, substance abuse services, pediatrics, et cetera.

I think that is so cool. If you just glance at it casually it seems like yet another dumb "edgy" advertising joke, but the people who need it are going to get the point. Yay Chase Brexton.
rivka: (alex age 3.5)
Tonight Alex cried her eyes out because Edouard Laboulaye is dead.

We've been reading Lady Liberty: A Biography, which tells the story of the Statue of Liberty's conception, construction, financing, and installation in a series of first-person narratives. Laboulaye was a 19th-century French university professor who first had the idea that the French should comemmorate America's hundredth birthday with a monument.

There's a line towards the end where Bartholdi, the statue's sculptor, says he's sorry that Laboulaye didn't live to see their dream realized. Alex asked me why Laboulaye didn't live to see it, and I told her that he died while they were building the statue.

She burst into noisy sobs. "Ohhhhh, I'm so sad!"

"What's wrong?"

"I'm so sad that Laboulaye is DEAD!"

I thought she was putting me on, but genuine tears were pouring down her face. I made the mistake of trying to reason with her.

"But honey, the people in this book lived a very long time ago. More than a hundred years ago."

"Are..." her voice quavered. "Are most of them still alive?"

"No. They lived such a long long time ago that they're all dead now."

More howling sobs.

"Alex, most of them lived long lives, and they were so proud to see the statue they made. And the Statue of Liberty is still here, and people will always remember them when they see her."

"But I wanted to HUG them." She collapsed on the bed, still crying. "I never got to know them! I don't even REMEMBER them!"

It took forever to calm her down. It really seemed like genuine grief.
rivka: (druggie horses)
Everyone probably already saw this via [livejournal.com profile] jonquil or [livejournal.com profile] james_nicoll, but I feel compelled to post about it anyway.

Conservapedia (the same Conservapedia that hosted the Lenski affair) is debating the greatest mysteries of world history. For example: did humor exist prior to Christianity?

The talk page is a thing of beauty. Conservapedia founder Andy Schlafly demonstrates that a little knowledge is a dangerous thing: having learned somewhere that the classical definition of a "comedy" is not the same as the modern definition, he smugly counters everyone who brings up Aristophanes by explaining that Greek comedies were not intended to be funny. Conservapedia editors who have actually read Greek comedies argue with him in vain.

Here are some highlights of the debate: Read more... )

Profile

rivka: (Default)
rivka

April 2017

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30      

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Mar. 2nd, 2026 10:00 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios